Suchergebnisse

In Presidential Decree Republic of Indonesia Numb. 53 in 2012, it is explained that every railway operator which use railways infrastructure have to pay Track Access Charges (TAC) to Government. The rules of the calculation of TAC which have to be paid by PT.KAI is explained in Regulation of Transport Minister Numb. 62 in 2013. In this regulation, there is priority factor which has same value for every service type of the train (Fp=1). Actually, every service type of railway has different priority and gives different damages for infrastructure based on the speed. This research intended for analyzing the influence of priority factor to TAC. Quantitative description method is used in this research. The objects of the research are Executive, Business, and Economic class of passenger train in Java. It suggested with two alternatives calculation of TAC with variations in priority factor (Fp) which oriented on train travel time. Then, the best Fp is chosen which represented the real condition where the train with higher priority has to pay higher TAC than that of others. The result of this research, with Fp=1, showed the value of TAC for Economic class is IDR 68.00/GT/km, for Executive class is IDR 30.00/GT/km, while for Business class is IDR 28.00/GT/km. A modified of Fp, with two alternatives calculation, considering travel time and stay time of each railway service type showed a better result. The first alternative generates Fp= 1.39 for Executive class and gives IDR 42.00/GT/km for the average TAC, while Fp=1.21 for Business class and generates IDR 34.00/GT/km for average TAC. The second alternative generates Fp=3.00 for Executive class and it gives IDR 91.00/GT/km while for Business class generates Fp=2.00 and it gives IDR 56.00/GT/km. The calculation of TAC with second alternative is more represents the real condition, where Executive class has higher priority and speed than the other classes, so it also has to pay higher TAC.

The high population density and the increasing visitors in Yogyakarta aggravate the traffic congestion problem. BRT (Bus Rapid Transit) services, Trans Jogja has not managed to solve this problem yet. Introducing Light Rail Transit (LRT) has been considered as one of the solutions to restrain the congestion in Greater Yogyakarta. As the first indication that the LRT can be built in Greater Yogyakarta, the transportation affordability index was used to understand whether the LRT tariff was affordable. That tariff was calculated based on government policy in determining railway tariff. The forecasted potential passengers and LRT route have been analyzed as the previous steps to get LRT tariff. Potential passenger was forecasted from gravity mode, and the proposed LRT route was chosen using Multi Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). The existing transportation affordability index was calculated for comparison analysis using the percentage of the expenditures for transportation made by monthly income of each household. The result showed that the LRT for Greater Yogyakarta was the most affordable transport mode compared to the Trans Jogja Bus and motorcycle. The affordability index of Tram Jogja for people having average income was 10.66% while another people with bottom quartile income was 13.56%.Keywords: Greater Yogyakarta, LRT, affordability.

In order to provide better transportation systems, Indonesian Government is planning to develop a new high-speed rail system in Java that will connect two biggest cities in Java Island, Jakarta and Surabaya, with approximately 685 kilometers of entirely new track. This paper reviewed the Indonesian Government's plan to develop the high-speed rail in term of comparison to existing modes of transport.This study employs demands projection of high-speed rail using JETRO method and benchmarking from other countries' high speed rails. Furthermore, air pollution caused by transport mode was calculated based on the emission factor from CACP & CNT. The last is generalized cost that considers total time to travel as value of money.It can be concluded that journey time and fare of the high-speed rail is very competitive to the air transport in Jakarta-Surabaya corridor. The journey time to travel from Jakarta to Surabaya is 4 hours and 19 minutes by high-speed train and 4 hours and 40 minutes by air. Based on the benchmarking analysis, the suitable fare for the high-speed rail should be 70% of the air transport. This study predicted that 61% of air passenger, 18% of conventional rail passenger and 12% of bus passenger will switch to the high-speed rail service in 2020. In total, the high-speed rail will have 24% of market share for the passenger transport and becomes the second largest market share after road transport (52%). The conventional rail and air transport have 14% and 9% of total market share to travel from Jakarta to Surabaya and vice versa. The high-speed rail development reduces carbon emissions caused by transportation systems in Java Island. It has been calculated that there are 2.542 million tonnages of CO2 per annum without introducing high-speed rail, however, the CO2 emissions decrease to 1.694 million tonnages per annum if the high-speed rail is developed in Java Island. Generalized cost of the high-speed rail is higher than road and conventional rail. However, it is lower than air transport.Keywords: Java high-speed rail, HSR Comparison, modal share, journey time

Abstract The regency road management program budgeting process is carried out through a series of stages, starting from proposal to budget determination. Common perceptions regarding the basis for determining priorities for regency road management programs are essential so that the budgeting process is fast, directed, and transparent. This study begins with a questionnaire survey of government, community, and academic or researcher repre-sentatives regarding the importance and application levels of the criteria and sub-criteria in determining priorities in Kulon Progo Regency. Survey data, which were analyzed using Importance-Performance Analysis, resulted in criteria and sub-criteria that were modeled using Structural Equation Modeling. The resulting sub-criteria weights are then validated using the Delphi Method. This study produces a readiness criteria weight of 40% and a multicriteria weight of 60%. The weights of the multicriteria compilers are technical 34%, economic spatial 35%, and social geopolitical environment 31%. Keywords: road handling; program priority; regency roads; readiness criteria; multicriteria Abstrak Proses penganggaran program penanganan jalan kabupaten dilakukan melalui serangkaian tahapan, mulai dari usulan sampai dengan penetapan anggaran. Penyamaan persepsi, mengenai dasar penentuan prioritas program penanganan jalan kabupaten, sangat diperlukan agar proses penetapan anggaran menjadi cepat, terarah, dan transparan. Penelitian ini dimulai dengan survei kuesioner terhadap perwakilan pemerintah, masyarakat, dan akademisi atau peneliti mengenai tingkat kepentingan dan tingkat penerapan kriteria dan subkriteria dalam penentuan prioritas di Kabupaten Kulon Progo. Data hasil survei, yang dianalisis menggunakan Importance-Performance Analysis, menghasilkan kriteria dan subkriteria yang dimodelkan dengan menggunakan Struc-tural Equation Modeling. Bobot subkriteria yang dihasilkan selanjutnya divalidasi dengan menggunakan Metode Delphi. Penelitian ini menghasilkan bobot readiness criteria 40% dan bobot multicriteria 60%. Bobot kriteria penyusun multicriteria adalah teknis 34%, spasial ekonomi 35%, dan sosial lingkungan geopolitik 31%. Kata-kata kunci: penanganan jalan; prioritas program; jalan kabupaten; readiness criteria; multicriteria.

Abstract Roads can facilitate the distribution of goods and services so as to improve the welfare of the people in the areas that are traversed or connected by the road. Since the funds held by the government are not proportional to the length of the roads handled, comprehensive criteria are needed to be used in determining the priority of road management programs. The results of this study indicate that the criteria weights for determining the priority of the provincial road handling program in West Kalimantan Province, based on the validation results, are 45% and 55%, for readiness criteria and multicriteria, respectively. Keywords: road; road handling; program priorities; provincial road. Abstrak Jalan dapat memperlancar distribusi barang dan jasa sehingga mampu meningkatkan kesejahteraan hidup masyarakat di wilayah yang dilewati atau dihubungkan oleh jalan tersebut. Karena dana yang dimiliki oleh pemerintah tidak sebanding dengan panjang jalan yang ditangani, diperlukan kriteria yang komprehensif untuk digunakan dalam penentuan prioritas program penanganan jalan. Hasil studi ini menunjukkan bahwa bobot kriteria penentuan prioritas program penanganan jalan provinsi di Provinsi Kalimantan Barat, berdasarkan hasil validasi, adalah readiness criteria sebesar 45% dan multicriteria sebesar 55%. Kata-kata kunci: jalan; penanganan jalan; prioritas program; jalan provinsi.